Harvard research highlights link between midlife dietary habits and successful aging.
A study tracking over 100,000 people for 30 years found that maintaining a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and healthy fats from midlife can significantly enhance the likelihood of aging healthily. The research highlighted that healthy diets not only prevent diseases but also support independence and quality of life in older age. Key findings suggest that specific diets like the alternative healthy eating index and the planetary health diet are particularly effective in promoting healthy aging.
We all aspire to age gracefully, but a recent study reveals that fewer than 1 in 10 people can live free of disease while maintaining good physical, cognitive, and mental health past the age of 70. The study indicates that adhering to a healthy diet during midlife may boost your chances of achieving healthy aging.
The research, based on data from over 100,000 people spanning 30 years, revealed that people who followed a healthy diet from their 40s onward were 43-84% more likely to be well-functioning physically and mentally at age 70 compared with those who did not.
“People who adhered to healthy dietary patterns in midlife, especially those rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and healthy fats, were significantly more likely to achieve healthy aging,” said Anne-Julie Tessier, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health. “This suggests that what you eat in midlife can play a big role in how well you age.”
Tessier presented the findings at NUTRITION 2024, the flagship annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition held June 29–July 2 in Chicago.
Specific Dietary Impacts
In terms of particular foods, the researchers found that higher intakes of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, unsaturated fats, nuts, legumes, and low-fat dairy were associated with greater odds of healthy aging, while higher intakes of trans fat, sodium, total meats, red and processed meats were associated with a lower odds of healthy aging.
While many previous studies have shown that a healthy diet can help to ward off chronic diseases, the new research is unique in its focus on healthy aging — defined not just as the absence of disease but the ability to live independently and enjoy a good quality of life as we grow older.
“Traditionally, research and derived dietary guidelines have focused on preventing chronic diseases like heart disease,” said Tessier. “Our study provides evidence for dietary recommendations to consider not only disease prevention but also promoting overall healthy aging as a long-term goal.”
Researchers analyzed data from over 106,000 people going back to 1986. Participants were at least 39 years old and free of chronic diseases at the start of the study and provided information about their diet via questionnaires every four years. As of 2016, nearly half of the study participants had died and only 9.2% survived to age 70 or older while maintaining freedom from chronic diseases and good physical, cognitive, and mental health.
Dietary Patterns and Healthy Aging
The researchers compared rates of healthy aging among people in the highest versus lowest quintiles for adherence to each of eight healthy dietary patterns that have been defined by previous scientific studies. The strongest correlation was seen with the alternative healthy eating index, a pattern that reflects close adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Participants in the top quintile for this dietary pattern were 84% more likely to achieve healthy aging than those in the bottom quintile.
Strong correlations were also found for the empirical dietary index for hyperinsulinemia diet (associated with a 78% greater likelihood of healthy aging), planetary health diet (68%), alternative Mediterranean diet (67%), dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet (66%), the Mediterranean-DASH intervention for neurodegenerative delay (MIND) diet (59%) and empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (58%). A somewhat more modest association was found for the healthful plant-based diet (43%).
“A finding that stood out was the association between the planetary health diet and healthy aging,” said Tessier. “This diet is based on the EAT Lancet Commission’s report which emphasizes fruits, vegetables, whole grains, plant proteins, and healthy fats from sustainable sources. The fact that it emerged as one of the leading dietary patterns associated with healthy aging is particularly interesting because it supports that we can eat a diet that may benefit both our health and the planet.”
The ties between diet and healthy aging remained strong even when the researchers accounted for physical activity and other factors that are known to impact health. Tessier noted that each of the healthy dietary patterns was linked with healthy aging as a whole, as well as with the individual components of healthy aging, including physical health, cognitive functioning, and mental health.
Given the study’s focus on dietary patterns in middle age, Tessier said that future research could help to elucidate the potential impacts of switching to a healthier dietary pattern later in life.
Reference: “Optimal Dietary Patterns for Healthy Aging: Two Large US Prospective Cohort Studies” by Anne-Julie Tessier, Fenglei Wang, Andres V. Ardisson Korat, Heather A. Eliassen, Jorge E. Chavarro, Francine Grodstein, Jun Li, Liming Liang, Walter C. Willett, Qi Sun, Meir J. Stampfer, Frank B. Hu and Marta Guasch-Ferre, 2 July 2024, NUTRITION 2024.
4 Comments
I don’t trust this study. It has a political agenda. Note this quote: “This diet is based on the EAT Lancet Commission’s report which emphasizes fruits, vegetables, whole grains, plant proteins, and healthy fats from sustainable sources. The fact that it emerged as one of the leading dietary patterns associated with healthy aging is particularly interesting because it supports that we can eat a diet that may benefit both our health and the planet.” When you start taking about the planet and sustainability, it is clear this is a pitch promoted by environmental concerns, suggesting a huge bias.
First came the Church, sending missionaries around the world to promote ‘begetting,’ to grow the Church. Then came the industrial revolution with it’s ruthless greedy ‘bleedership’ wanting to fill their ever expanding industries with cheap labor. Then came the obscenely wealthy idealists who mistook their accidental good fortunes with ordained missions to make life better for everyone, in accordance with their maniacal standards. Now, we have about two and a half times the human population on earth that our planet can comfortably support and the semi-conscious obscenely wealthy idealists want the majority of us to pay again for what they have done, this time with so-called “expert” diets that don’t yet factor-in a few fundamentals of chronic-disease causing nutritional expert errors.
Minimally, animal products contain some nutrients humans can’t metabolize and assimilate from vegetarian sources and some fruits and vegetables can be toxic; nature rules and the science is fatally flawed. Now eighty years of age, I’m never in the best of health but, despite forty-three years and counting of at-first unknown US FDA approved food poisoning, I’m again/still regular prescription treatment free and living independently in a four season rural location; the walking, talking, reading, writing proof of my lay findings and practices. More: https://odysee.com/@charlesgshaver:d?view=about
The EAT-Lancet Commission consists of 37 world-leading scientists from 16 countries from various scientific disciplines. The goal of the Commission was to reach a scientific consensus by defining targets for healthy diets and sustainable food production. The findings of the Commission provide the first ever scientific targets for a healthy diet and sustainable food production within planetary boundaries that will allow us to feed up to 10 billion people by 2050.
This study was conducted by scientists from around the world. There is no political connection. They were trying to determine if the planet could support a population of 10 Billion and what changes were needed for that eventuality to be possible. This study is about the planets ability to sustain human viability at that population level, not a pitch promoted by environmental concerns.
Ronald, first, food for ten billion people is only one aspect of the problem. Then, we have housing, clothing, education, healthcare, infrastructure, recreation, religion and transportation, minimally, to factor-in. It has been obvious to a number of us for decades (e.g., https://populationconnection.org/about-us/) that the single greatest natural threat to humanity and the environment is overpopulation.
More specifically, I first wrote the US FDA of may early lay findings of connections between allergies, added MSG, chronic disease and obesity in October of 2005 (obviously, now, in-vain) and thousands of professional others since with mostly similar results. Even more specifically, following my at-home discovery of a serious personal calcium deficiency and of serum calcium testing not being reliable in late 2010, I submitted a one-page “Correspondence” of my lay findings to The Lancet, which they declined to publish. If those so-called “experts” you cited are expert at anything, it’s ignoring reality. For more dietary ‘reality,’ please visit the “About” page of my video channel, linked-to above.