
Scientists have recreated the extreme conditions of the early universe in particle accelerators, revealing surprising insights about the formation of matter.
New calculations show that up to 70% of certain particles may originate from later reactions rather than the initial quark-gluon soup formed just after the Big Bang. This discovery challenges previous assumptions about the timeline of matter formation and suggests that much of the matter around us formed later than expected. By understanding these processes, scientists can better interpret the results of collider experiments and refine their knowledge of the universe’s origins.
Recreating the Early Universe’s Extreme Conditions
The early universe was 250,000 times hotter than the core of our sun. That’s far too hot to form the protons and neutrons that make up everyday matter. Scientists recreate the conditions of the early universe in particle accelerators by smashing atoms together at nearly the speed of light. Measuring the resulting shower of particles allows scientists to understand how matter formed.
The particles that scientists measure can form in various ways: from the original soup of quarks and gluons or from later reactions. These later reactions began 0.000001 seconds after the Big Bang, when the composite particles made of quarks began to interact with each other. A new calculation determined that as much as 70% of some measured particles are from these later reactions, not from reactions similar to those of the early universe.
Understanding the Origins of Matter
This finding improves scientific understanding of the origins of matter. It helps identify how much of the matter around us formed in the first few fractions of a second after the Big Bang, versus how much matter formed from later reactions as the universe expanded. This result implies large amounts of the matter around us formed later than expected.
To understand the results of collider experiments, scientists must discount the particles formed in the later reactions. Only those formed in the subatomic soup reveal the early conditions of the universe. This new calculation shows that the number of measured particles formed in reactions is much higher than expected.
Significance of Later Reactions in Particle Formation
In the 1990s, physicists realized that certain particles form in significant numbers from the later reactions following the initial formation phase of the universe. Particles called D mesons can interact to form a rare particle, charmonium. Scientists lacked consensus on how important the effect is. Since charmonium is rare, it is difficult to measure.
However, recent experiments provide data on how many charmonium and D mesons colliders produce. Physicists from Yale University and Duke University used the new data to calculate the strength of this effect. It turns out to be much more significant than expected. More than 70% of charmonium measured could be formed in reactions.
Implications for Understanding Matter’s Origins
As the hot soup of subatomic particles cools, it expands in a ball of fire. This all happens in less than one-hundredth of the time it takes for light to cross an atom. Since this is so fast, scientists are unsure exactly how the fireball expands.
The new calculation shows that scientists do not absolutely need to know the details of this expansion. The collisions produce a significant amount of charmonium regardless. The new result brings scientists one step closer to understanding the origins of matter.
Reference: “Hadronic J/ψ regeneration in Pb+Pb collisions” by Joseph Dominicus Lap and Berndt Müller, 11 October 2023, Physics Letters B.
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138246
This work was supported by the Department of Energy Office of Science, Nuclear Physics program. One of the researchers also acknowledges the hospitality and financial support provided during a sabbatical stay at Yale University.
14 Comments
LOL, what Big Bang?!
Always Is. Always was. Always will be.
Cosmic Rearrangement Hypothesis.
Taking Structured Atomic Model to its natural next level… Without denying even more fundamental Truth and reality.
VERY GOOD!
The constant formation of new substances and the constant change and disappearance of old substances are the laws of evolution of things. There is no eternal fixed mass, but eternal fluid mechanics. As a part of the universe, humans are too small to observe the entire universe, whether in the river of time or in the present moment.
Scientific research guided by correct theories can help humanity avoid detours, failures, and pomposity. Please witness the exemplary collaboration between theoretical physicists and experimentalists (https://scitechdaily.com/microscope-spacecrafts-most-precise-test-of-key-component-of-the-theory-of-general-relativity/#comment-854286). Some people in contemporary physics has always lived in a self righteous children’s story world. Whose values have been overturned by such a comical and ridiculous reality?
Misguided by the pseudo-scientific theory of Physical Review, many researchers do not consider the similarities and differences between geometric shapes and physical reality in physics research, but indulge in imagination, and some scholars’ physics research seriously deviates from science, and they are almost unaware of the dirtiness and ugliness. Although mathematics is the language of science, it must be understood correctly.
I hope researchers are not fooled by the pseudoscientific theories of the Physical Review, and hope more people dare to stand up and fight against rampant pseudoscience.
The so-called academic journals (such as Physical Review Letters, Nature, Science, etc.) firmly believe that two high-dimensional spacetime objects (such as two sets of cobalt-60) rotating in opposite directions can be transformed into two objects that mirror each other, is a typical case of pseudoscience rampant.
Scientific research should be respected, but some people in contemporary physics are not. Please witness the actions of certain individuals and publications. If researchers are really interested in Science and Physics, you can browse https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/643404671 and https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/595280873.
The Physical Review journals, features 17 peer-reviewed publications including Physical Review Letters, Physical Review X, and Reviews of Modern Physics. CP violation was published in Physics Review in 1956. All so-called peer-reviewed publications of Physical Review family are responsible for clarifying this.
CP violation opened the dirtiest and ugliest era in the history of physics. Countless so-called scientific research and awards have become a self entertaining children’s farce.
Still here spewing your pseudo-science, hoping someone will visit the link you desperately keep spamming? You’d earn more money as a chinese political misinformation troll.
Thank-you. It’s time they got rid of his account.
Please witness these insults. Don’t know what this has to do with chinese political misinformation troll?
I had an uncontrollable urge to laugh. Can Physical Review journals family represent American science and politics?
I guess idiocy isn’t painful… as evidenced by you not screaming in agony.
center of sun about 25 million degress. this is 250000 times hotter. where did all this heat come from?
Heat, by definition, is the collective kinetic energy of particles in a given space. As energy transformed in to mass, the particle pairs that were produced possessed massive amounts of kinetic energy. When they collided with other particles, the kinetic energy transformed in to more particles (similar to what happens in particle colliders today), until a large portion of the energy was transformed in to particles, thereby “cooling” the volume of space.
Oh, I know! The universe started as God’s little joke. It still is a joke.
Nope. The universe is not you.
Truth? You do science for Trump? Take your rhetoric to a Christian site and let scientists discuss facts.
TheHeck
Thanks for someone finally telling off that BwahaZhang nuisance.
Why this ‘Science’ online rag didn’t ban Bao long ago is a mystery to me.
I tend to look for understanding rather than confrontation. Knowledge rarely expands from a cat fight!
I agree.
Mathematics is the foundation of science. The establishment of physical theories must be based on mathematics and practice, not imagination and practice. The physical phenomena observed in scientific experiments are always appearances, not the natural essence of things. The natural essence of things needs to be extracted and sublimated via mathematical theories through the appearances of things.